Trenchless Service Line Replacement
Fix Potential Lead Issues in Your Water Supply with Trenchless Service Line Replacement
In April of 2014, in an effort to save costs on the city’s water supply, the city of Flint, Michigan stopped buying water from the neighboring city of Detroit and began pumping water from the Flint River in anticipation of connecting to a new regional water supply that was being developed from Lake Huron. What happened next is a thing of nightmares for water utilities and their customers across the country.
Flint Water Crisis
Despite immediate health symptoms that were showing up in its residents, Flint continued to state that the water from the river being delivered through their water supply system was safe. The city even passed on the opportunity to reconnect to the Detroit water supply, which would have removed the issue with safe, clean drinking water. At the heart of the issue were bacteria levels and chlorination. When bacteria levels were too high for human safety, a common issue with the Flint River, the water utility added more chlorine to the water, but failed to add the federally-required anti-corrosive agents, which caused significant amounts of lead to leech out of the city’s pipes, fittings and fixtures and into corrosive water, contaminating the water supply with waterborne lead.
When the issues were discovered, it was truly a mind-boggling issue. One resident, LeeAnne Walters, a stay-at-home mother of four and Navy wife, had lead levels as high as 13,200 parts per billion (PPB), more than double the 5,000 PPB at which point the EPA considers water to be hazardous waste. This level equates to about 50 milligrams of lead per gallon. Mrs. Walters had sent her water for testing because she was worried that the dark sediment in her water was making her and her children sick and giving them rashes, especially her three-year-old twin sons. The city initially stated that the lead must be in her home’s pipes and fixtures, but when the Walters had purchased the home, the old plumbing lines had already been stolen for salvage in low-employment Flint. They had been completely replaced with lead-free plastic piping.
At the time that her service line was replaced by city workers following the first rounds of testing, an EPA expert returned in time to take a piece of the line for testing; it was pure lead, confirming her fears that the lead was coming from the water while in transit to her home. She had good reason to fear for her children’s well-being. Two years later, twin son Gavin was 35 pounds compared to his identical brother Garrett’s 53 pounds. Gavin’s growth had been stunted by the lead in the water. Four years later, her twin sons were still in occupational, physical and speech therapy. They may never recover fully from their early lead exposure and poisoning, forming a precious burden on their family for decades to come. This is reflected by statements made by a Flint principal who noticed that the school district’s special education caseload has doubled since the incident.
There can be no doubt that lead in our water supply can lead to significant human and animal health concerns. Following the Flint crisis, water utilities across the country scrambled to ensure that a situation such as this could not come about again. But why is lead such a serious issue with water supply lines? Why do we need to take strong action to make sure that people are protected against situations like this arising again? How do we protect against issues such as this to defend our communities against the perils of lead poisoning? You’ll find the answers you need below.
The Severity of Lead-in-Water Issues
During the Flint water crisis, Mayor Karen Weaver initially estimated that the city would need to replace 15,000 water service lines that were galvanized steel or lead, a figure which was later upgraded to 18,000 per a landmark case settlement and then increased to an estimated 29,100 lines when a study by University of Michigan was released. That figure represents 53% of the city’s 55,000 service lines, the replacement of which will have a huge impact on the city’s budget as work commences, leaving the city dependent on state and federal aid to replace the lines and protect its citizens’ from the perils of lead poisoning. These figures may end up being somewhat lower, as the final figure was based on a partial survey of the city and many residences are now unoccupied, but the replacement of tens of thousands of lead supply lines will still need to happen.
How many residents in other cities and states are being impacted by issues such as these? Early in 2019, testing in Newark, New Jersey lead to the discovery that over half of the tested households had unsafe lead levels in their drinking water. It’s estimated that the water utility will need to replace an estimated 15,000 service lines, a process that is estimated to cost $75 million and six years to complete. The city’s labor- and cost-intensive process is tearing up streets around the area to dig up and inspect the old service lines, replacing them if lead content is found, then re-burying the line and re-paving the road. While the process is ongoing, the city has switched to a different anti-corrosive agent in the source water, which leaves the treatment plant lead-free, to lower the amount of lead that is being leeched out of the pipes while it is en route to residents’ homes, hopefully reducing the amount of lead that will show up in drinking water.
Taking Preventative Action
Many cities are getting ahead of the issue before it becomes a problem. Buffalo, New York is taking advantage of state funding for initiatives to remove lead from water utility systems by replacing up to 200 lead supply lines every year as they break or leak, though there have not been any serious issues to date with lead poisoning or lead levels in the city water. Property owners who do not have supply line coverage in their homeowner’s insurance will have the cost of replacement covered by the city. Milwaukee is using a city initiative to replace up to 1,000 supply lines per year, though with an estimated 75,000 lead supply lines in the city, the progress is extremely slow at best. To date, all of the city’s daycare and child care centers that have lead supply lines have had them replaced, protecting one of the most vulnerable populations from lead poisoning.
Denver is currently working on one of the most ambitious initiatives, estimated to take 15 years at a cost of $500 million. Unlike many other water utilities that are only replacing water lines when an issue has appeared, the city plans to systematically replace all of their lead water supply lines, estimated at between 50,000 and 90,000 at a rate of about 5,000 lines per year. The city has already been removing lead lines when they encounter them during construction, and Denver Public Schools has taken proactive steps to remove all lead supply lines from their schools. At the same time, Denver’s city water utility is taking steps to prevent lead leeching in the existing lines while the process is ongoing, in an approach similar to Newark’s use of more effective anti-corrosive treatments. If the initiative passes, the utility will issue water filters to tens of thousands of affected homes and making further adjustments to alkalize the water, as lead is much more likely to leech out in water with an acidic pH.
BUFFALO, NY AND DENVER, CO ARE JUST A FEW EXAMPLES OF SAFE WATER INITIATIVES SPREADING ACROSS THE COUNTRY!
To date, 16 states have begun initiatives to remove lead supply lines from their borders. Seven communities have completely replaced all their lead supply lines, with an additional 106 communities having set solid goals to eliminate lead supply lines from their borders and a further 50 communities have begun the process of lead supply line replacement, but have yet to develop solid goals around these actions. This process, at times, is made more difficult as ownership of the supply line is different from city to city and state to state, with either the utility or the property owner claiming ownership of the lines. It can also be a prohibitively expensive process, as many municipalities still dig up their old supply lines rather than using more modern methods of replacement, such as in-place service line pulling for a less expensive, trenchless approach.
- New Jersey
- New York
- North Carolina
What are the Federal Lead Rules?
The EPA has a specific regulation in place, called the Lead and Copper Rule, which regulates the amount of lead and copper that are allowed be present in drinking water provided by water utilities and similar organizations. Though it has undergone some number of changes since its inception in 1991, it essentially dictates that no more than 15 PPB of lead or 1.3 parts per million (PPM) of copper are allowable in drinking water in more than 10% of customer taps that are sampled. The number of taps that are sampled each testing cycle is dictated by the number of structures the water utility serves. If those limits are exceeded, there are a number of remedies that must be undertaken in order to protect the public health and well-being. In the Flint water crisis, there were questionable testing procedures used, such as letting the water flow for several minutes before collecting a sample rather than collecting the first water that was drawn from the fixture, which decreases the level of lead that would show up in the sample.
These rules were put in place to help minimize the effects of lead in the water, which has been known to cause issues with memory, brain damage, kidney issues and other health effects, as well as the effects of excess copper in the water, which can cause digestive distress, liver and kidney damage as well as complications from Wilson’s Disease in populations that are genetically predisposed to this illness. When water testing shows an excess of lead above the acceptable action limit of 15 PPB, the water utility is required to begin providing educational materials as part of their community outreach to help customers understand the potential health effects of exposure, sources of lead exposure and how to lower their exposure to lead. They are also expected to make special efforts to reach out to at-risk populations, such as children and pregnant women, in whom the effects of lead poisoning may appear at significantly lower levels. Press releases are an expected part of this outreach process. Overall, the outreach must begin within 60 days of the above-limit or action level testing and continue until follow-up testing has shown the waterborne lead levels to have dropped beneath the action level for a specified period of time.
Another issue with exceeding the action level for waterborne lead is the addition of source water monitoring and treatment to help determine how the source water is contributing to the overall lead levels in the water. Corrosion control treatments are also used to limit the amount of lead from leeching from existing pipes and infrastructure into the water by reducing the corrosiveness of the water being transported. If, with these two systems in place, the levels of lead continue to remain above the action level of 15 PPB, the EPA can then require the water utility to begin removing and replacing lead service lines. As with the public education mandate, these processes can stop once follow-up testing has shown that the waterborne lead levels have been reduced to beneath the action level. However, the impact on the public goodwill remains, forcing many water utilities to continue replacing lead supply lines in order to counteract the bad press they’ve received over the high lead levels in the water in the first place.
General Information About Lead in Drinking Water
The first question that many consumer have when lead is reported in drinking water is how it gets there in the first place. Within the home, it can come from a wide range of possible sources. It can show up in solder for copper pipes that were installed prior to 1986, when lead was still allowable in plumbing solder. Solder that has been manufactured for this purpose since this point is required to be lead-free under the Safe Drinking Water Act, preventing it from being an issue. Some fixtures in the home may have been made prior to various lead-free manufacturer requirements or may be below the threshold for the requirements at the time, but may still contain some small amount of lead, which is commonly added to brass during the casting process to help prevent voids from forming within the casting and to make the tooling process easier. Galvanized iron pipe, though it does not specifically contain lead, may allow lead particles to attach to the inner surfaces of the pipe, which may eventually detach and enter your drinking water. Lead service lines and goose necks or pigtails may be used either for the entire run of the service line from the meter to your home or for short distances to connect the service line to the water main, a common practice when several water service lines are expected to be connected at the time that the main is being installed, to minimize future digging and repaving processes.
In Flint’s situation, the lead in their system only became a problem when they began using polluted water from the Flint River in place of the Lake Huron water the water utility had been pumping from Detroit. The polluted water had a number of issues that required correction. An outbreak of Legionnaire’s disease and several tests that revealed the presence of E. coli and high levels of coliform bacteria in unacceptable amounts for human health required the water utility to add extra amounts of chlorine to the water, making the water more corrosive than in the past. Typically, water utilities that have to undergo actions such as this or that are using water that is known to be more corrosive at the source will add anti-corrosive chemicals to treat the water, reducing the pH to a less corrosive amount. However, Flint didn’t take this approach, even though it was required to do so by federal law. As the corrosive water passed through its system, it came into contact with lead fittings, supply lines and other sources of lead which then allowed that lead, which had remained in the system without issue previously, to be leeched into the water supply, causing significant harm to the water utility’s customers.
Unfortunately, as residents in Flint soon came to learn, there are a number of very serious health effects that can occur when people are exposed to lead in drinking water. Lead is a toxic substance that the EPA has a goal of zero exposure, but is actually tolerated at very low levels in drinking water due to the virtual impossibility of removing the lead completely in a cost-effective manner. However, fetuses, infants and young children are especially susceptible to lead in their environment and bodies, with strong effects even at far lower levels of exposure than would typically affect adults. Exposure leads to a wide range of physical, mental, emotional and developmental issues in children. Lead exposure can cause damage to the central and peripheral nervous system, learning disabilities, stunted growth, hearing impairment, anger control issues and impaired function and formation of blood cells. Indeed, it was a pediatrician in Flint who began putting together the first scientific documentation of elevated lead levels in the city’s children, which has resulted in an epidemic of behavioral and learning problems, lower IQ, hyperactivity, anemia, slower growth rates and hearing problems. In the unborn, lead exposure in the womb can lead to reduced fetal growth and premature birth – in those that survive to that point. Lead has been linked to miscarriage, stillbirths and infertility in pottery factory workers well over a century ago. Lead also has a tendency to be mistaken for calcium by the body, literally forming a baby’s bone tissues out of the toxic substance.
There was one very common question during the Flint water crisis, which was whether you could shower or bathe in the lead-contaminated water. The EPA states that bathing and showering should be safe for children and adults, because human skin doesn’t absorb the lead in the water. However, it should be noted that the first signs noted by Flint residents included rashes that would appear on children’s skin when bathing in the lead-contaminated water of the city, and adults that would spent significant time bathing in the water would also develop rashes, though not as severe. Many of these residents noted that the rashes would stop appearing when they switched to cleaning themselves with bottled water or would shower and bathe with water from other sources. Whether this was due to the presence of lead in the water or simply the corrosive water itself that caused the lead to be leeched into the water is up for debate, but in either case, medical symptoms like this should not be ignored. It is certainly safer to run the water for several minutes to clear out the most heavily contaminated water that has been sitting in the system collecting lead before beginning bathing or showering and to prevent children from drinking the bath water.
Challenges Faced by Water Utilities in Replacing Lead Service Lines
With these serious issues at hand, many consumers are wondering why water utilities are not simply replacing all of the lead service lines that are in use. However, it’s important to note that the average consumer doesn’t truly grasp the depth of the issue, the amount of work involved in the process and the expense that’s involved in changing out a service line. These issues can make the process prohibitive for many water utilities, which is why state and federal initiatives to help with the expense are helping many municipalities move forward with what would otherwise be an impossible task. The three top issues involved in replacing these service lines are the time that it takes to get the task completed, the expense that puts a strain on already-tight municipal budgets and the fallout from public inconvenience as the lines are dug up and replaced.
When a lead supply line must be removed, it takes a significant amount of time to complete the task. Initially, the service line must be identified as a lead line to ensure that proper priority is being placed on its replacement. The line must then be traced and marked back out to its origin at the water main, which is often buried beneath a roadway. Once the line’s location is properly marked, other utilities in the area must also be marked, to prevent accidental damage to those lines. Following this process, the appropriate notices and permits must be posted or acquired before digging commences. A backhoe or other heavy equipment is brought in and the street blocked off while the old supply line is dug up, with hand digging taking place around other utilities to prevent damage. The old line is shut off and disconnected from both the water main end and the house end, and then a new supply line is placed, connected, tested for leaks and finally reburied. After this part of the process is complete, repairs to the surface pavement, turf and other areas must be undertaken.
If you think this sounds expensive, it is. Water service line replacement typically runs several thousand dollars, and the expense is rising every year. In an economy where wages are constantly rising along with other costs, it’s projected that the cost of replacing a supply line will go up by 3-5% every year, at the same time that citizens are fighting tax increases that may support these increased expenses. Equipment, fuel, parts and materials are also rising in cost, and of course, we can’t forget the rising cost of litigation when water utilities, such as Flint, are found at fault for not properly handling their waterborne lead issues.
Another consideration for many water utilities is the public inconvenience that is involved in the process. Water must be shut off to the home, inconveniencing the homeowner. If the water line is buried under the street, the street must be shut down, inconveniencing neighbors. If it’s a busy street, the traffic must be routed around the work, causing more work for the police as drivers on unfamiliar routes have accidents or otherwise cause congestion issues. At the same time, more complaints are being called into the city and the water utility, even as they try to have all hands on deck and working hard in the field to complete the work quickly so that they can get onto the next project on the list. This entire process makes the removal of lead supply lines difficult at best for water utilities.
However, there are other options available to make the process faster, easier and less expensive while reducing customer complaints. Using a service line puller can bring the process of changing lead service lines within the grasp of even the smallest water utilities. This allows you to meet the demands of consumers who want their service lines replaced while minimizing the impact on your water utility’s budget, task list and repair process. In the past, the effectiveness of these tools have been limited by their design, which has often been engineered to only work in soft, loose soils, but new options are available.
How to Replace a Service Line with a Service Line Puller Kit
New Concept Tools was formed to provide the water utility industry with better options for safer, more effective operations, and our service line puller kits are an exceptional example of that dedication to purpose.
How Can the New Concept Tools (NCT) Service Line Puller Kits Help?
How Do NCT Service Line Puller Kits Work?
What if you could replace those old, corroded lead service lines without having to do 90% of the digging? What if you could avoid stopping traffic while spending hours removing the old line and getting the new one in place? What if you could avoid most of the expense of having to re-pave roads after changing out a service line? Would that make the process of changing out service lines an easier, less expensive and less aggravating one for your water utility? Of course it would! But how does it work? By using our specially-designed Service Line Puller Kits.
New Concept Tools isn’t the first company that has developed a service line puller, but our dedication to developing superior tools for the water utility industry means that we’ve developed one of the best service line puller kits available in the industry. Rather than focusing on a single pipe size and type, our two available kits each handle a range of pipe sizes and materials from 3/4″ to 2″. The kits include the Split Bull Head puller, strong cables in multiple lenths, starting and adapting tools, a cable grab as well as a hammer lock and oval link that attaches to a piece of equipment for pulling, such as a backhoe bucket, and a range of different heads for attaching and pulling the new pipe.
The Service Line Pulling Process
When you use an NCT Service Line Puller Kit, you’ll need to dig a hole to access the ends of the supply lines, but not the middle. Once those holes are dug, you’ll make sure the water supply is turned off and disconnect the supply lines at both ends, cleaning up about 6-8″ of the service line and then cutting it off by using a wheel cutter at each end. If the ends have been damaged, the starter tool can be used to return them to round. A cable is then passed through the existing supply line, which is then attached to the Split Bull Head carrying the new supply line on its back end. The Split Bull Head should be assembled with anti-seize compound applied to make it easy to assemble and disassemble. Our Split Bull Head is detachable instead of permanently attached, as it allows for easy field repairs if you experience cable breakage. The attachment process simply involves tightening a few Allen head screws. If the structure end of the supply line passes through the home’s wall, you’ll need to make sure there’s enough clearance for the Split Bull Head and related tools to pass through the wall into the soil on the other side.
Our kit allows you to attach copper or steel pipe directly to the Split Bull Head for pulling, either by direct threading or by using a brass compression coupler. You can also use the Split Bull Head with our plastic adaptor that allows you to pull a range of plastic piping through behind the Split Bull Head. The other end of the cable is attached to the cable grab, which is attached to the backhoe or other pulling equipment with the hammer lock and oval link. The Split Bull Head is then pulled through the existing supply line in a straight line using a backhoe or other heavy equipment. As it passes through the existing lead supply line, it either splits, expands or pulls that old line out while drawing the new supply line in place behind it. When the equipment reaches its maximum draw, the cable is released from the cable grab, the old pipe that is sticking out is cut off and removed, and the cable grab is moved to a location near the cut on the cable and the pipe is pulled again until the new line is in place. Within a very short amount of time, the old supply line is no longer an issue, and the new supply line has been laid in place and is ready to be connected and tested for leaks. Once it’s installed, you simply backfill the holes, make a small paving repair if needed and go about your day, getting to the next task on your list.
Service Line Puller Kit: Instruction Manual
This service line puller kit manual will provide you with all the necessary information to use your kit properly. Inside you’ll find information on:
- Included Products
- Removing Different Pipe Types
- Product Numbers
Cost-Effective Supply Line Replacement
Because your water utility is not spending a lot of extra time digging, refilling and repairing pavement, your costs for replacing lead service lines is minimal. In the past, service line puller kits have only been available to work with one size and pipe material. Our service line puller kits work with 3/4″ and 1″ pipe in our small-diameter kit and 1-1/4″, 1-1/2″ and 2″ pipe in our large-diameter kit, and both kits can be used to pull not just lead supply lines, but also steel, copper or plastic pipe, making it a tool that will work well for your water utility long into the future for a variety of needs.
Our detachable Split Bull Head allows you to make fast field repairs if a cable breaks, instead of having to wait for a replacement cable and bull head to show up like some of our competitors’ models. The cable grabber makes changing the position of the grabber on the cable simple, so that you can quickly pull more cable once the old pipe section from that pull is removed. The hammer lock keeps the cable grabber safely and securely attached to the oval link, providing a safer alternative to just looping the cable around a backhoe bucket, causing wear, tear and fraying on your cable. This reduces damage and provides a safer working environment for your crew. You spend less time excavating and repairing your excavation because you simply pull the new pipe through or behind the old one as it goes, which means fewer unhappy customers because the job is completed more quickly. It also means you’ll see reduced costs from repair materials and labor, which makes it easier and faster to get through the process of replacing lead service lines, allowing you to replace more of them every year.
A Truly Trenchless Solution
But will our service line puller kit work in your water utility’s soil conditions? We have a video that shows how quickly and easily the process works, and some viewers are convinced that it’s only this easy because the dirt must be too soft. Not true! We’ve designed our kit to be a heavy-duty solution that works in all soils, whether you’re dealing with loose sand, heavy gravels or tight-packed clay. We use strong, heavy-duty cables and components to give you the solutions you need, despite heavy soil issues.
No matter what your soil conditions are, you can draw the service line puller kit through that soil to remove, expand or split the old service line and pull the new line behind it quickly and easily. Like all of our quality water utility tools, our Service Line Puller Kit is designed to provide maximum results with superior safety and easier usage than other options available on the market. Its strong, solid construction will allow you to pull new supply lines through virtually any soils you can find in your water utility, giving you an inexpensive trenchless pulling solution no matter your local conditions.
A Glance at Each Tool in the Service Line Puller Kit
We provide our trenchless Service Line Puller Kit in two different sizes to handle a range of pipes, providing you with a wider range of versatility. We know that water utilities typically have a range of different supply line materials, so our kits each include all of the tools you’ll need to get the job done quickly and effectively, whether you’re pulling lead, copper, steel or plastic piping. We also offer replacement parts if you lose or misplace portions of your kit, rather than requiring you an entirely new kit. Here’s a quick look at each of the tools that are offered in our kits.
Hammer-Lock and Oval Link
The oval link supplies a flexible connection to the backhoe or other heavy equipment, while the hammer lock provides a solid, safe connection between the two pieces, preventing injuries that can happen when a cable that is simply wrapped around a backhoe bucket is frayed and stressed enough that it finally snaps.
New Concept Tools’ is Dedicated to Developing Stronger, Safer, and Easier Tools for the Water Utility Industry
The tragedy that has taken place in Flint has opened water utility customers’ and officials’ eyes across the country and around the world. The children who have been impacted by waterborne lead in Flint may never grow to lead full, productive lives, but will quite possibly bear the burden of their exposure for the rest of their lives. The twin boys referenced at the beginning of this page still ask, five years later, whether the water they are being given to drink is good water or bad water, an experience that will stay with them for decades to come. The strong coverage of this situation has changed how our customers view their water utilities and city governments. The basic trust that the water coming out of their tap is safe for their families to drink has been drastically reduced.
No longer are customers willing to remain complacent, trusting that their water utility is always doing the right thing in the public’s best interests. To stay on top of this trend, water utilities are scrambling to replace lead supply lines, but often at a high cost of labor, time, public goodwill and the expense of the process. To be left behind during this process means earning public distrust, especially in areas that have been hard-hit by lead problems in the past. However, just as water customers are changing their simple trust of the water that comes out of their tap, so too may water utilities change their process to help their transition from lead service lines to safe, lead-free supply lines. Instead of being stuck in the old way of digging huge trenches to replace a single, small service line that has so much potential for human illness, an easier option is available to get the job done quickly with a lower overall cost and inconvenience than in the past.
New Concept Tools’ dedication to developing stronger, safer, easier tools for the water utility industry has been fulfilled in their Service Line Puller Kits. These kits provide you with almost everything you need to pull old lead service lines out and install safe, new, lead-free service lines at the same time. All you need to provide is the power in terms of a backhoe or similar heavy equipment and manpower to manage both ends of the service line. Instead of wasting your community’s time and money in a long, drawn-out process, you can efficiently and economically replace lead service lines to provide clean, healthy water for the community under your care. Please feel free to contact the experienced professionals at New Concept Tools today to learn more about our Service Line Puller Kit or any of the other innovative tools we’ve developed for water utility use over the years.